Case Report: A rare case of bilateral middle ear tophaceous gout.

Introduction: Hypacusia can be caused by various etiologies; however, hearing loss attributed to gouty tophi remains a rare occurrence. This case report presents, for the first time, a bilateral gouty tophi causing hearing impairment. Case presentation: This report describes a case study involving an 83-year-old Caucasian female patient who presented symptoms of hypacusia, pruritus, and a sensation of pressure in her right ear. A computed tomography scan revealed the presence of non-homogeneous calcified structures in both ears. Following a comprehensive assessment that included pure-tone audiometry and a thorough evaluation of the patient's clinical complaints, a tympanoplasty procedure was initially performed on the right ear. Pathological analysis revealed the presence of gouty tophi. After surgical removal of the tophus, a notable improvement in the patient's hearing threshold was observed. Four months later, a similar surgical intervention was performed on the contralateral ear, achieving a similar positive outcome. The substantial postoperative decrease of bone conduction indicates an inner ear affection by the gout tophi. Conclusion: Gout tophus in both ears is a very rare but possible cause of hypacusia, even in the absence of a pre-existing diagnosis of systemic gout disease. We report a case of gout tophi in both ears as a rare cause of hearing loss.

Occlusion of the Lateral Semicircular Canal, Endolymphatic Sac Surgery, and Cochlear Implantation: A Low Destructive Treatment for Unilateral Ménière's Disease and Deafness.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment of Ménière's disease (MD) and deafness aims to treat vertigo and hearing disabilities. Current treatment options like labyrinthectomy and cochlear implantation (CI) have shown acceptable results but are destructive. Less destructive procedures, like the occlusion of the lateral semicircular canal and endolymphatic sac surgery, have been shown to be successful in vertigo control. The combination of both procedures with CI has not been investigated; therefore the objective of this study was to investigate the outcome of this combination in patients with single-sided MD and moderately severe to complete sensorineural hearing loss. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 10 patients with single-sided MD and moderately severe to complete sensorineural hearing loss were included. In all of them, a single-staged surgery, which consisted of CI, endolymphatic sac surgery, and occlusion of the lateral semicircular canal, was performed. The surgery was performed after a failed conservative therapy trial. The clinical outcome was evaluated by the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and audiological tests. These were assessed preoperatively, 3 and 6 months after surgery. An MRI with a hydrops sequence was performed to support the clinical diagnosis. RESULTS: After the combined surgery, the mean DHI testing improved significantly from 71 to 30. Mean audiological monosyllabic speech testing outcome with the cochlea implant was 65% at 65 dB. The residual hearing of 2 patients could be preserved after the surgical procedure. CONCLUSION: The combination of occlusion of the lateral semicircular canal, endolymphatic sac surgery, and CI is an efficient low traumatic treatment for patients with a single-sided MD and moderately severe to complete sensorineural hearing loss.

Corrigendum: A new device for the removal of cochlear schwannoma: A temporal bone study.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1077407.].

Prospective Evaluation of 3 T MRI Effect on Residual Hearing Function of Cochlea Implantees.

INTRODUCTION: The approval process for MRI safety of implants includes physical observations and an experimental evaluation in artificial settings to simulate the in vivo effect. This contains the observation of temperature changes and artificial current generation by the magnetic field. From these findings, the safety of an implant and its effect on the patient can be estimated. MRI safety is based on an in vivo evaluation of adverse events after the approval process, but an actual analysis of the effect on different tissues is not followed. The effect of MRI scanning in cochlea implantees on their residual hearing as the correlate of the hair cell function is so far unknown, therefore the aim of the present study was to observe the effect of 3 T MRI on the residual hearing of cochlea implantees. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective study, we performed a 3 T MRI T2 2D MS Drive sequence in eight cochlea-implanted ears. Before and after the MRI scan, a bone conduction pure tone audiogram (BC PTA) was performed. All cochlea implantees had a pre-scanning threshold of low frequency residual hearing between 20 dB and 65 dB. RESULTS: Low frequency mean residual hearing was not affected by the 3 T T2 2D MS Drive sequence. We observed a pre-scanning threshold at 250 Hz of 42.9 (SD 3.9) dB and for 500 Hz 57.1 (SD 6.4) dB. Post-scanning BC PTA was for 250 Hz 42.1 (SD 3.9) dB and for 500 Hz 57.1 (SD 5.7) dB. CONCLUSION: 3 T MRI scanning has no significant functional effect on the hair cells in cochlea implantees in low frequencies with a T2 2D MS Drive sequence.

Influence of Intracochlear Air on Experimental Pressure Measurements.

INTRODUCTION: Intracochlear pressure changes have been assumed to play a central role in hearing preservation during cochlear implantation. The pressure in different settings has been evaluated (temporal bones vs. cochlea models) and was found to have advantages and disadvantages. Experimentally, problems have been discussed to influence the results substantially. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of intracochlear air on the measurements in a cochlea model by using a fiber optic pressure sensor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The experiments were performed in an uncurled 3D printed full cochlea model. A microfiber-optic pressure sensor was inserted, and intracochlear pressures were evaluated under 3 conditions: (1) cochlea model filled to 100% with fluid, (2) cochlea model filled with air, and (3) cochlea model filled to approximately 50% with fluid. Since the cochlea model is transparent, a direct visualization of air under the microscope was possible when performing the insertions. RESULTS: In the first condition, the mean intracochlear pressure at the end of the insertion was 0.044 psi (SD 0.012, 95% CI). In the second setting, the results were similar. In the last scenario, with 50% filling, the mean intracochlear pressure was statistically significantly different with a mean value of 0.074 psi (SD 0.013, 95% CI) (p < 0.0044, ANOVA). Besides this, in the last condition with 50% fluid, a plateau was formed when the fiber optic reached the air portion. CONCLUSION: The results obtained in a 3D printed full cochlea model show the importance of a direct evaluation of air inside the experimental setting. The exclusion of intracochlear air should be an important factor for the choice of the model for intracochlear pressure measurement (temporal bone vs. cochlea model).

Effect of Underwater Insertion on Intracochlear Pressure.

Background: The importance of intracochlear pressure during cochlear electrode insertion for the preservation of residual hearing has been widely discussed. Various aspects of pre-insertional, intra-insertional, and post-insertional relevant conditions affect intracochlear pressure. The fluid situation at the round window during electrode insertion has been shown to be an influential factor. Aims/Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare various insertion techniques in terms of the fluid situation at the round window. Material and Methods: We performed insertion of cochlear implant electrodes in a curled artificial cochlear model. We placed and fixed the pressure sensor at the tip of the cochlea. In parallel to the insertions, we evaluated the maximum amplitude of intracochlear pressure under four different fluid conditions at the round window: (1) hyaluronic acid; (2) moisturized electrode, dry middle ear; (3) middle ear filled with fluid (underwater); and (4) moisturized electrode, wet middle ear, indirectly inserted. Results: We observed that the insertional intracochlear pressure is dependent on the fluid situation in front of the round window. The lowest amplitude changes were observed for the moisturized electrode indirectly inserted in a wet middle ear (0.13 mmHg ± 0.07), and the highest values were observed for insertion through hyaluronic acid in front of the round window (0.64 mmHg ± 0.31). Conclusions: The fluid state in front of the round window influences the intracochlear pressure value during cochlear implant electrode insertion in our model. Indirect insertion of a moisturized electrode through a wet middle ear experimentally generated the lowest pressure values. Hyaluronic acid in front of the round window leads to high intracochlear pressure in our non-validated artificial model.